Three ballot committees drew most of California’s reported out-of-state campaign dollars in 2022

By PubSys CalAccess · PubSys CalAccess is operated by Britto, Inc. It is not affiliated with the California Secretary of State.

California’s 2022 campaign records list $285 million in contributions from locations outside the state—more than one in five dollars that could be mapped. More than half of that amount went to just three committees. They opposed new dialysis-clinic requirements, supported online sports betting, and backed restrictions on flavored tobacco. Their reported contributors included DaVita, Fresenius Medical Care and Michael R Bloomberg.

Where the reported out-of-state dollars came from

$285.1 million · 22.2% of mapped signed dollars in 2022

2022 monetary contributions to California committees by reported state and D.C., excluding CaliforniaSigned dollars add positive and negative entries. Darker green means a higher explicit dollar band. California is gray-hatched because it is excluded, not zero or missing. Alaska and Hawaii use conventional insets; DC has an enlarged labeled marker. Exact ranked values and records follow in an accessible table.Alaska: $27,123.31 signed; 50 records; <$1MAlabama: $45,014.78 signed; 128 records; <$1MArkansas: $1,368,362.42 signed; 118 records; $1–<5MArizona: $1,577,987.45 signed; 1,290 records; $1–<5MCalifornia: excluded from outside-California population; not zero or missingColorado: $9,211,253.30 signed; 876 records; $5–<10MConnecticut: $1,894,152.80 signed; 464 records; $1–<5MDistrict of Columbia: $99,315,347.29 signed; 2,238 records; $75M+Delaware: $506,839.41 signed; 157 records; <$1MFlorida: $15,466,482.62 signed; 1,383 records; $10–<50MGeorgia: $3,826,744.17 signed; 662 records; $1–<5MHawaii: $37,484.22 signed; 234 records; <$1MIowa: $220,397.51 signed; 103 records; <$1MIdaho: $194,668.31 signed; 241 records; <$1MIllinois: $7,002,795.46 signed; 1,650 records; $5–<10MIndiana: $1,276,655.20 signed; 204 records; $1–<5MKansas: $142,277.06 signed; 182 records; <$1MKentucky: $1,769,082.06 signed; 194 records; $1–<5MLouisiana: $312,197.15 signed; 293 records; <$1MMassachusetts: $18,062,131.86 signed; 1,045 records; $10–<50MMaryland: $3,465,860.53 signed; 819 records; $1–<5MMaine: $14,456.30 signed; 73 records; <$1MMichigan: $2,655,183.61 signed; 863 records; $1–<5MMinnesota: $1,317,187.90 signed; 535 records; $1–<5MMissouri: $2,804,179.31 signed; 576 records; $1–<5MMississippi: $8,897.96 signed; 68 records; <$1MMontana: $65,942.20 signed; 110 records; <$1MNorth Carolina: $1,304,605.13 signed; 494 records; $1–<5MNorth Dakota: $6,463.90 signed; 27 records; <$1MNebraska: $692,665.67 signed; 96 records; <$1MNew Hampshire: $12,142.14 signed; 137 records; <$1MNew Jersey: $1,024,573.57 signed; 709 records; $1–<5MNew Mexico: $47,193.73 signed; 181 records; <$1MNevada: $9,799,019.25 signed; 934 records; $5–<10MNew York: $56,697,743.13 signed; 2,007 records; $50–<75MOhio: $876,357.96 signed; 663 records; <$1MOklahoma: $215,164.09 signed; 169 records; <$1MOregon: $267,067.62 signed; 868 records; <$1MPennsylvania: $13,666,314.23 signed; 871 records; $10–<50MRhode Island: $266,126.68 signed; 131 records; <$1MSouth Carolina: $68,190.94 signed; 223 records; <$1MSouth Dakota: $3,429.00 signed; 35 records; <$1MTennessee: $1,959,140.35 signed; 480 records; $1–<5MTexas: $13,875,684.70 signed; 3,361 records; $10–<50MUtah: $574,447.23 signed; 360 records; <$1MVirginia: $3,652,088.82 signed; 856 records; $1–<5MVermont: $5,680.00 signed; 39 records; <$1MWashington: $7,003,796.39 signed; 1,614 records; $5–<10MWisconsin: $376,365.90 signed; 231 records; <$1MWest Virginia: $11,912.00 signed; 23 records; <$1MWyoming: $83,510.45 signed; 69 records; <$1MDCAlaskaHawaii
  • <$1M
  • $1–<5M
  • $5–<10M
  • $10–<50M
  • $50–<75M
  • $75M+

Largest reported source locations · signed dollars

  1. 1. Washington, D.C. (DC)$99,315,347.29
  2. 2. New York$56,697,743.13
  3. 3. Massachusetts$18,062,131.86
  4. 4. Florida$15,466,482.62
  5. 5. Texas$13,875,684.70
  6. 6. Pennsylvania$13,666,314.23

California: neutral gray hatch = excluded, not zero or no data. Alaska/Hawaii are inset; the DC marker enlarges its small area. Color bands are not proportional to dollar differences.

29,134 monetary contribution records dated January–December 2022 list another U.S. state or D.C., totaling $285,078,387.07 after adding positive and negative entries—22.2% of mapped signed dollars. The meaning of negative entries is unproven. With positive amounts alone, the outside-California share is 22.8%; this sensitivity is not the map’s metric.

Reported locations do not verify residence or headquarters. Receipts may count money at more than one committee stage and do not measure spending. Records with mappable states cover 98.5% of signed dollars; missing locations may be uneven. Snapshot: September 14, 2026. Generalized 2020 Census reference boundaries, not address verification.

Exact ranked source-state and D.C. values — 2022
Descending signed dollars; 49 other states and D.C. California is excluded. Records are transactions, not people.
Reported locationRecordsSigned dollars
1. District of Columbia (DC)2,238$99,315,347.29
2. New York (NY)2,007$56,697,743.13
3. Massachusetts (MA)1,045$18,062,131.86
4. Florida (FL)1,383$15,466,482.62
5. Texas (TX)3,361$13,875,684.70
6. Pennsylvania (PA)871$13,666,314.23
7. Nevada (NV)934$9,799,019.25
8. Colorado (CO)876$9,211,253.30
9. Washington (WA)1,614$7,003,796.39
10. Illinois (IL)1,650$7,002,795.46
11. Georgia (GA)662$3,826,744.17
12. Virginia (VA)856$3,652,088.82
13. Maryland (MD)819$3,465,860.53
14. Missouri (MO)576$2,804,179.31
15. Michigan (MI)863$2,655,183.61
16. Tennessee (TN)480$1,959,140.35
17. Connecticut (CT)464$1,894,152.80
18. Kentucky (KY)194$1,769,082.06
19. Arizona (AZ)1,290$1,577,987.45
20. Arkansas (AR)118$1,368,362.42
21. Minnesota (MN)535$1,317,187.90
22. North Carolina (NC)494$1,304,605.13
23. Indiana (IN)204$1,276,655.20
24. New Jersey (NJ)709$1,024,573.57
25. Ohio (OH)663$876,357.96
26. Nebraska (NE)96$692,665.67
27. Utah (UT)360$574,447.23
28. Delaware (DE)157$506,839.41
29. Wisconsin (WI)231$376,365.90
30. Louisiana (LA)293$312,197.15
31. Oregon (OR)868$267,067.62
32. Rhode Island (RI)131$266,126.68
33. Iowa (IA)103$220,397.51
34. Oklahoma (OK)169$215,164.09
35. Idaho (ID)241$194,668.31
36. Kansas (KS)182$142,277.06
37. Wyoming (WY)69$83,510.45
38. South Carolina (SC)223$68,190.94
39. Montana (MT)110$65,942.20
40. New Mexico (NM)181$47,193.73
41. Alabama (AL)128$45,014.78
42. Hawaii (HI)234$37,484.22
43. Alaska (AK)50$27,123.31
44. Maine (ME)73$14,456.30
45. New Hampshire (NH)137$12,142.14
46. West Virginia (WV)23$11,912.00
47. Mississippi (MS)68$8,897.96
48. North Dakota (ND)27$6,463.90
49. Vermont (VT)39$5,680.00
50. South Dakota (SD)35$3,429.00
Total outside California29,134$285,078,387.07

Three ballot committees received 58.5% / $166.7 million of the reported out-of-state signed dollars: No on 29, Yes on 27 and Yes on 31. With positive amounts alone, their share is 60.1%.

Where the 2022 outside-California signed dollars went
Recipient committeeSigned receipts
No on 29$73,943,028.58
Yes on 27$49,891,099.00
Yes on 31$42,851,000.00
Other recipient committees$118,393,259.49

Who supplied the reported money?

The No on 29 committee received $73.9 million in contributions listing locations outside California, after adding positive and negative entries. Its reported contributor groups included DAVITA, INC., at $45.3 million, and FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE, at $23.4 million. Both groups listed Washington, D.C.; that field does not establish where either company is headquartered. Their positive-only amounts were $52.5 million and $27.1 million, respectively.

The Yes on 27 committee received $49.9 million from reported out-of-state locations. Its reported contributors included Crown Gaming Inc., doing business as DraftKings, at $16.6 million; Penn Interactive Ventures and FBG Enterprises Opco at $12.5 million each; and BetMGM at $8.3 million. Those amounts are positive entries with no negative entries in the respective retained groups.

The Yes on Proposition 31 committee received $42.9 million from reported out-of-state locations. Records grouped under the reported name MICHAEL R BLOOMBERG accounted for $42.65 million of it. A separate spelling appears elsewhere in the data; it has not been combined into a person-level total here.

The contrast is visible in the number of entries, too: reported out-of-state locations account for 4.6% of mapped records but 22.2% of mapped dollars. Records are transactions, not a count of people.

The pattern extends beyond 2022. In the 2015–16 election cycle, reported locations outside California accounted for 28.4% of mapped contribution dollars; in 2017–18, they accounted for 25.6%. Those statewide figures do not identify which campaigns drove the totals.

These are two-year periods, January of the odd year through December of the even year—not calendar 2022. Shares use summed signed monetary contributions. Mapped-dollar coverage is 97.1% for 2015–16 and 97.8% for 2017–18; missing locations may be uneven. Positive-only shares are 28.4% and 25.5%, respectively. Reported location is not verified residence, headquarters or ultimate origin. Source: frozen local complete-cycle screen, 2026-09-17-v1, derived from the accepted aggregate evidence.

These filings identify reported contributors and receiving committees. They do not establish motives, electoral influence or the money’s ultimate origin. The useful next step is to inspect the receiving committee’s filings, keeping the reported transaction and any subsequent spending separate.

Committee filing lists (not transaction-level links): No on 29 · Yes on 27 · Yes on 31. These research views may show newer data or broader receipt totals. Official filings remain the source of record.

How we built this view

Start with the filings. PubSys imports the California Secretary of State’s downloadable CAL-ACCESS records. This analysis uses the September 14, 2026 source snapshot. Official filings remain the source of record.

Choose the records. For each filing, we use the highest amendment identifier available in that snapshot. Within each filer and filing, repeated transaction identifiers are reduced to one record, using the line item when necessary. Missing or malformed identifiers can limit these rules. We select monetary contributions reported on Schedule A with readable amounts and transaction dates from January 1 through December 31, 2022. Loans and nonmonetary contributions are excluded. Positive, negative and zero amounts are retained; a record is not a unique person.

The 2022 story. We select dated monetary contributions from January 1–December 31, 2022 after the amendment and deduplication steps. “Mapped” means a normalized reported state in the 50 states or D.C.; “outside California” means the other 49 states and D.C., not unknown or foreign locations. Of 633,637 included records totaling $1,305,488,664.59 signed, 632,958 records and $1,286,091,729.68 were state-mappable. Outside California accounts for 29,134 records (4.6% of mapped records) and $285,078,387.07 (22.2% of mapped signed dollars). Signed adds positive and negative entries; their meanings are not established. Mappable states cover 98.5% of all included signed dollars, not a claim that missing records are representative.

Recipients and sensitivity. Receiving committees are grouped by filer ID. The three committees total $166,685,127.58, or 58.5% of outside-California signed receipts. Positive-only outside receipts are $297,108,452.79 of $1,303,220,463.63 mapped positive receipts (22.8%); the three committees received $178,449,727.58 of that amount (60.1%). All other recipients total $118,393,259.49 signed. Committee receipts are not transfer-net: the same money may appear at more than one committee stage. Receiving money is not spending it. A filer ID or committee-like entity code is a signal, not proof of a transfer, and does not override a reported “other” classification.

Reported contributor groups, not resolved identities. We retain the prepared table’s contributor key. The local pipeline rule uses a reported contributor filer ID when available; otherwise it fingerprints normalized name, city, state and ZIP. The most frequent reported name labels the group, with ties broken by latest transaction date, then name. This is not verified identity resolution. Different spellings and keys are not merged into person-level totals. Location fields establish neither residence nor headquarters, and reported contributors do not establish ultimate funding origin. No street address, ZIP, contact or employment details are displayed in this supplement. The historical deployed SQL revision was not retained, so the local grouping definition is not cryptographic proof of the runtime code.

Connect committees to measures, then verify filings. Retained committee-to-measure records match the 2022 election and support/oppose position; the receipt-level measure fields were empty and are not the basis of these descriptions. California’s official voter guides explain the measures: Proposition 29, Proposition 27 and Proposition 31. Filing-list links are research starting points, not verified transaction click-throughs. The retained evidence includes filing, amendment and transaction-or-line identifiers for follow-up in official filings. Checks reconcile the same prepared table; they do not independently reconstruct raw filings or prove motives, influence, identity or ultimate origin. The 2022 finding is historical, not a forecast.

Draw the 2022 origin map. We trim and uppercase reported state codes. The map adds positive and negative amounts within each of the other 49 U.S. states and D.C.; California is excluded, not zero or missing. Six explicit signed-dollar bands use lower-inclusive boundaries of $1 million, $5 million, $10 million, $50 million and $75 million. Color differences are not proportional dollar differences; the ranked table preserves every exact amount and record count. Positive-only sensitivity stays in text, not a separate map layer.

The generalized 2020 Census state geometry is reference geography, not address or residence verification. Alaska and Hawaii use conventional insets; the enlarged, labeled D.C. marker is not area-proportional. Missing, malformed and non-U.S.-state locations are excluded from the mapped denominator but remain in the all-record coverage calculation. Loans and nonmonetary receipts are excluded. Negative entries reduce signed totals without establishing whether they are refunds or other adjustments.

This frozen 2022 analysis uses a September 14, 2026 source snapshot and transaction dates from January 1 through December 31, 2022. PubSys refreshes data manually, with no promised cadence; later filings or amendments may change records. The cutoff defines scope, not a guarantee of completeness.

Source, versions and limitations

Two-cycle comparison: frozen local outside-ca-cycle-screen/2026-09-17-v1, derived from the accepted monthly state and annual coverage tables; cycle-screen.csv SHA-256 952a044decb8300d1d01046459b16d181c588b0f7f6c196b6c7fbbb840729fd8. Ratios use summed dollars, not averages of monthly shares; no campaign attribution is made.

2022 attribution supplement 2026-09-17-v1; extract SHA-256 35dcf03856a02a5c4ba3891d76582bb1218541c469cb35c1602565a09ff6c446; recipient-context SHA-256 65a592a6ed91ea3aa85726f93ae26ab5e2b3376fe38bbaae6eeca487d029c511. Retained snapshot as of September 15, 2026 at 04:55:48.656441 UTC, from the September 14 source snapshot. This article presents only the 2022 attribution subset; retained historical exploration components are not rendered here.

Content 2026-09-17-outside-ca-release-v4; analysis 2026-09-16-v1; geometry census2020-r1. Root SHA-256: 589c1fef6e3ea597c1b08e820d4144f3dc9cb6ba198b58e642c069f8d6594973.

Limitations

  • Reported locations do not verify residence or headquarters; reported names are not independently resolved identities.
  • State-mappable records cover 98.5% of signed dollars in 2022. Missing locations may be uneven; unknown or foreign locations are not outside-California U.S. states.
  • Committee receipts can count money at more than one stage and do not measure spending or ultimate origin. Transfers are not identified or netted.
  • Negative-entry meaning is unknown. Source errors, later filings and amendments may change the records. No motive, influence, causation or electoral-effect claim is made.
Responsibility, reuse and corrections

Byline: PubSys CalAccess

Accountable editor: Todd Fulton

Publisher: Britto

PubSys CalAccess is operated by Britto, Inc. It is not affiliated with the California Secretary of State.

Prepared with AI assistance for analysis, writing, visualization and review. Todd Fulton is responsible for publication and corrections.

You may reuse the unchanged infographic with attribution to PubSys CalAccess, a link to this article, the source snapshot date and its accompanying qualifications. Full republication requires permission. This does not restrict legally permitted uses or claim ownership of underlying facts.

Corrections

To suggest a correction, include this article URL, the official source URL, and relevant record IDs. No response time is promised. info@britto.io.