Donor header
$2,500 total given · Largest contribution $1,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$2,500
Contribution footprint
3 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 50%
Top 3 100%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE CAMPAIGN - YES ON PROP. 22, A SPECIAL PROJECT OF COMMITTEE ON MORAL CONCERNS | $1,250 | 50% | 2 | Jan 2000 - Feb 2000 | |
| PAGE FOR ASSEMBLY 2014, CHUCK | $1,000 | 40% | 1 | Nov 2014 - Nov 2014 | |
| MEUSER FOR STATE SENATE 2016 | $250 | 10% | 1 | Jan 2015 - Jan 2015 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.
Donor header
$2,500 total given · Largest contribution $1,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$2,500
Contribution footprint
3 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 50%
Top 3 100%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE CAMPAIGN - YES ON PROP. 22, A SPECIAL PROJECT OF COMMITTEE ON MORAL CONCERNS | $1,250 | 50% | 2 | Jan 2000 - Feb 2000 | |
| PAGE FOR ASSEMBLY 2014, CHUCK | $1,000 | 40% | 1 | Nov 2014 - Nov 2014 | |
| MEUSER FOR STATE SENATE 2016 | $250 | 10% | 1 | Jan 2015 - Jan 2015 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.