Donor header
$469,600 total given · Largest contribution $240,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$469,600
Contribution footprint
5 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 93.7%
Top 3 99.1%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO ON BALLOT BOX PLANNING COMMITTEE, SPONSORED BY LABOR, HOME BUILDERS AND HOUSING ADVOCATES | $440,000 | 93.7% | 5 | Sep 2000 - Dec 2000 | |
| HOUSTON FOR ASSEMBLY, 2002, GUY S. | $15,500 | 3.3% | 3 | Sep 2000 - Jun 2002 | |
| COMMITTEE FOR URBAN EXCELLENCE | $10,000 | 2.1% | 1 | Feb 2002 - Feb 2002 | |
| CHAN FOR STATE SENATE | $3,600 | 0.8% | 4 | Dec 2003 - Aug 2008 | |
| CHAN FOR STATE SENATE 2004 | $500 | 0.1% | 1 | Jun 2002 - Jun 2002 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.
Donor header
$469,600 total given · Largest contribution $240,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$469,600
Contribution footprint
5 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 93.7%
Top 3 99.1%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO ON BALLOT BOX PLANNING COMMITTEE, SPONSORED BY LABOR, HOME BUILDERS AND HOUSING ADVOCATES | $440,000 | 93.7% | 5 | Sep 2000 - Dec 2000 | |
| HOUSTON FOR ASSEMBLY, 2002, GUY S. | $15,500 | 3.3% | 3 | Sep 2000 - Jun 2002 | |
| COMMITTEE FOR URBAN EXCELLENCE | $10,000 | 2.1% | 1 | Feb 2002 - Feb 2002 | |
| CHAN FOR STATE SENATE | $3,600 | 0.8% | 4 | Dec 2003 - Aug 2008 | |
| CHAN FOR STATE SENATE 2004 | $500 | 0.1% | 1 | Jun 2002 - Jun 2002 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.