Donor header
$26,900 total given · Largest contribution $5,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$26,900
Contribution footprint
6 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 30.5%
Top 3 78.1%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STONE FOR ASSEMBLY 2014, FRIENDS OF MARK | $8,200 | 30.5% | 2 | Dec 2013 - Sep 2014 | |
| STONE 2012 FOR ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 29, FRIENDS OF MARK | $7,800 | 29% | 2 | Aug 2011 - Oct 2012 | |
| ELECT CLIMATE CHAMPIONS FUND SPONSORED BY CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS | $5,000 | 18.6% | 1 | Oct 2002 - Oct 2002 | |
| ACHADJIAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2010, KATCHO | $3,900 | 14.5% | 1 | May 2009 - May 2009 | |
| KUEHL FOR SENATE | $1,000 | 3.7% | 1 | Dec 2002 - Dec 2002 | |
| FEUER FOR ASSEMBLY 2010, MIKE | $1,000 | 3.7% | 1 | Oct 2009 - Oct 2009 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.
Donor header
$26,900 total given · Largest contribution $5,000
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$26,900
Contribution footprint
6 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 30.5%
Top 3 78.1%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STONE FOR ASSEMBLY 2014, FRIENDS OF MARK | $8,200 | 30.5% | 2 | Dec 2013 - Sep 2014 | |
| STONE 2012 FOR ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 29, FRIENDS OF MARK | $7,800 | 29% | 2 | Aug 2011 - Oct 2012 | |
| ELECT CLIMATE CHAMPIONS FUND SPONSORED BY CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS | $5,000 | 18.6% | 1 | Oct 2002 - Oct 2002 | |
| ACHADJIAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2010, KATCHO | $3,900 | 14.5% | 1 | May 2009 - May 2009 | |
| KUEHL FOR SENATE | $1,000 | 3.7% | 1 | Dec 2002 - Dec 2002 | |
| FEUER FOR ASSEMBLY 2010, MIKE | $1,000 | 3.7% | 1 | Oct 2009 - Oct 2009 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.