Donor header
$1,480 total given · Largest contribution $780
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$1,480
Contribution footprint
3 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 52.7%
Top 3 100%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DORFMAN FOR SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE 2010 | $780 | 52.7% | 1 | Jan 2010 - Jan 2010 | |
| HAAKENSON, 2010, FRIENDS TO RE-ELECT JUDGE PAUL | $500 | 33.8% | 3 | Apr 2004 - Oct 2004 | |
| CHOU 2012, CITIZENS TO RETAIN JUDGE JAMES | $200 | 13.5% | 1 | Mar 2012 - Mar 2012 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.
Donor header
$1,480 total given · Largest contribution $780
Giving is concentrated among a small set of recipients.
Active cycles
Panel 2 • Finance overview
Total given
$1,480
Contribution footprint
3 recipients
Concentration
Top recipient 52.7%
Top 3 100%
Top 10 100%
Spike markers
Panel 3 • Top recipients
| Recipient | Total | Share* | Count | Dates | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DORFMAN FOR SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE 2010 | $780 | 52.7% | 1 | Jan 2010 - Jan 2010 | |
| HAAKENSON, 2010, FRIENDS TO RE-ELECT JUDGE PAUL | $500 | 33.8% | 3 | Apr 2004 - Oct 2004 | |
| CHOU 2012, CITIZENS TO RETAIN JUDGE JAMES | $200 | 13.5% | 1 | Mar 2012 - Mar 2012 |
* Share is percent of donor total in the selected scope. Page rows are a subset and typically do not sum to 100%.